Platform TL;DR: - Gamma Strategies is a protocol for active liquidity management and market making strategies on Uniswap and other concentrated liquidity AMMs.

What do you want to see happen in Uniswap governance over the next year?

We would like to see greater representation of liquidity providers (LPs) on Uniswap because it is desperately needed. The LPs, especially those who provide active liquidity, provide tremendous value in the form of lower price impact for traders and greater volumes for Uniswap.

The LPs should have as much voice in governance as the value they provide to the ecosystem. We would love to see established liquidity providers in this space like ourselves, Arrakis, and others to participate and represent the interests of the LPs, and for $UNI holders to recognize their importance in the ecosystem by delegating to not only us but all the established liquidity providers who have contributed to making Uniswap a better place to trade.

Reasons for wanting to be a delegate:

We want to represent the interests of LPs. The LPs are the backbone of Uniswap, and they have important interests that should be heard when making large protocol decisions.

Skills and areas of expertise:

We provide an infrastructure for active liquidity management and market making on concentrated liquidity AMMs. This includes infrastructure for automating rebalances, compounding liquidity positions, rewarding active liquidity, and providing analytics on LP positions.

Past contributions to Uniswap ecosystem and/or demonstrated protocol knowledge (if applicable):

In terms of our product, we were early builders in building vaults on top of Uniswap v3. We've participated in joint efforts with the Uniswap Foundation in incentivizing concentrated liquidity on Optimism. We represent Uniswap's interests in the Optimism Governance forum, and have continually provided feedback to the Uniswap Foundation.

For more information, please see our docs here: https://docs.gamma.xyz/gamma/.

What are your views on 3 past Uniswap governance proposals?

1. Deploying Uniswap V3 (on other networks) - We support having more venues to provide liquidity in generally, so we're usually in favor of launching on new networks.

2. DeFi Education Fund - While we were in favor of the intent of this proposal, in our opinion, the funding method was suboptimal. Some amount of UNI tokens up front, with majority of UNI tokens in a locked ETH-UNI LP position with the LP proceeds going to fund development would have been a more optimal, mutually beneficial, and sustainable method of funding this campaign.

3. Fee Switch - We believe the fee switch should be implemented in ways that would be value accretive to the ecosystem in terms of attracting volumes and liquidity.

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest:

We are market neutral in our liquidity providing venues, which include Uniswap, QuickSwap, Thena, Zyberswap, and others.