Reason: I agree with most of this in principal but I dont think an onchain vote is an appropriate way to express or endorse this, and I'm also a bit of a "bylaws minimalist" wrt DAOs in general- enumerating a bunch of potentially unenforceable rules feels like a distraction

Reason: A good project and strong team in a predictable and transparent roadmap, planned and projected. I think in the near future we will see an unprecedented growth of this project. But in all seriousness, there's a bit of a free-rider problem with supporting this sort of public good/open access gov infra, but I think at Uniswap's scale it makes sense to bite the bullet and put forward a small but meaningful contribution, even if other daos end up free-riding on it.

Reason: Huge fan of the work this team has been doing at Compound. I think they can fill some key gaps at Uniswap as well.

Reason: Bit of risk of increased liquidity fragmentation. But overall I think the potential benefit is more than enough to justify activating more fee tiers.

Reason: Reward amounts seem reasonable (total yearly cost <$1 million), and should help support a vibrant ecosystem of DAO contributors.

Reason: DEF has delivered good work, and I believe this is good value for money for UNI holders and the Uniswap DAO. There's a bit of a free rider problem and I hope to see other DAOs make meaningful contributions as well, following Uniswap's lead.