logo
ENS Avatar
0x8d...a265
Voting power2.302M
Delegated addresses92
Proposals created0
For/Against/Abstain
5802

Delegate Statement

I vote for what I think best aligns with the long term benefit of all Uniswap protocol stakeholders, including token holders, LPs, and traders.

I'm a risk analyst with Block Analitica (primary risk management consultant for MakerDAO) in my day job, and moonlight as a governance participant and delegate for a few other protocols including Uniswap.

I've been an active UNI voter since launch of governance back in 2020, and am proud to have a consistent record of participation, voting on nearly every valid/non-cancelled on chain proposal.

I'm lucky to have significant support from a few unknown large token holders. While I welcome additional support from new delegators, I also think it would be great to spread delegations around to newer, up and coming delegates to support decentralization and increase governance participation!

Top Issues

Fee switch
Fee switch
I think fee switches should only be turned on after careful review of potential risks vs benefits. Generally I favor a cautious approach, and believe Uniswap protocol generally stands to benefit more from user growth and adoption rather than extracting fees prematurely.
Cross chain deployments
Cross chain deployments
Generally think Uniswap should have a bias for action / saying yes to cross chain deployments. As long as a suitably secure bridge is available for governance message passing, there's little risk in deploying to a chain that ends up having limited adoption.
Public goods
Public goods
Defi eduction fund seems to be going well, contrary to what many people expected at the time it was proposed. I think Uniswap governance should be open to consider funding other high quality public goods projects in the future.