Reason: Currently, we don’t have a strong opinion on this. We think the revisions made are good. If people want to fund this proposal, we won't oppose it, but we don’t think we’ll see much value in the research either. The goal of the Uniswap Revitalization and Growth program is for Uniswap to establish a position in new chains such that if the chain ends up growing significantly, Uniswap can grow with the chain rather than trying to join later and face an uphill battle. The incentives are meant to help Uniswap establish itself at the chain during the initial launch and then end with no plan to bring it back. The hope is that two or three chains that get these incentives grow to become massive chains, and then we'll have a great market position. Generally, we learn the most about a new blockchain's potential success in those few months while working with them on the new deployment, marketing, and other post-launch efforts.

Reason: We voted to abstain in the temperature check and will vote to abstain here as well. Most of our reasons are available on the forum. To summarize, we don't believe this initiative will be successful in gaining back our lost market share from Aerodrome because we're competing against their token incentives. We're not voting against the proposal because we don't believe it can harm the protocol, but we also don't think there is much upside in the action either, so we're not voting for it. If the DAO wants to improve LP flexibility, then we should focus on the GTM of v4.